Ask readers to name the greatest fictional spies and the conversation quickly becomes an argument.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
James Bond?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
George Smiley?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Jason Bourne?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Carrie Mathison?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Jackson Lamb?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The problem is partly the question. \u201cSpy\u201d is an extraordinarily broad description. Espionage fiction has given us case officers, intelligence analysts, assassins, counterintelligence investigators, undercover operatives, asset handlers, defectors, double agents, bureaucrats, and people whose precise job description seems deliberately obscure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
That diversity is one reason the genre remains so interesting.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
For this list, I am interested primarily in fictional intelligence professionals<\/strong>, not simply characters who happen to become involved in espionage. Influence matters. Authenticity matters. Character matters. So does the extent to which each figure changed our idea of what a fictional intelligence officer could be.<\/p>\n\n\n\n There will be omissions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n There should be.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A list about espionage fiction that produces complete agreement probably isn't worth reading.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 1. George Smiley<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Created by John le Carr\u00e9<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n George Smiley may be the most convincing fictional intelligence officer ever created.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He is short, overweight, bespectacled, badly dressed, frequently underestimated, and almost completely devoid of the physical glamour traditionally associated with fictional spies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n That is precisely the point.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Smiley's weapon is his mind.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He listens. He remembers. He recognizes inconsistencies. He understands institutions and, more importantly, understands the people inhabiting them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy<\/em>, Smiley's hunt for a Soviet mole inside British intelligence becomes a master class in fictional counterintelligence. He reconstructs events from files, conversations, bureaucratic decisions, personal histories, and seemingly minor contradictions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n His adversary is not merely a foreign intelligence service.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It is betrayal itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Smiley helped establish that an intelligence officer sitting quietly in a room could be every bit as compelling as one carrying a gun.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why he matters:<\/strong> Smiley made intelligence analysis and counterintelligence intellectually thrilling.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2. James Bond<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Created by Ian Fleming<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n It is easy to dismiss Bond because he became too successful.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The cars. The casinos. The women. The gadgets. The villains. The vodka martinis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Popular culture eventually overwhelmed the intelligence officer Fleming originally put on the page.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Return to Casino Royale<\/em>, however, and Bond is considerably darker.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He is a professional operating on behalf of the British state. He can be brutal. He can be frightened. He can make mistakes. And the work can hurt him.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Bond's importance to espionage fiction is impossible to exaggerate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Fleming turned the intelligence officer into an international cultural figure. Thousands of subsequent characters were created either to imitate Bond or to reject him.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Smiley himself becomes more significant when understood partly as the anti-Bond.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why he matters:<\/strong> Bond established the popular image of the modern secret agent against which almost every fictional spy since has been measured.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 3. Alec Leamas<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Created by John le Carr\u00e9<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n If Bond represented the glamorous intelligence professional, Alec Leamas represented the bill that eventually comes due.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In The Spy Who Came in from the Cold<\/em>, Leamas is exhausted, cynical, angry, and approaching the end of his usefulness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n British intelligence sends him into one more operation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The brilliance of Leamas is that he never feels like a superhero. He feels like a man who has spent too long inside a profession requiring deception.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Le Carr\u00e9 asks a question that would become central to serious espionage fiction:<\/p>\n\n\n\n What happens to people who repeatedly manipulate others in the name of national security?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Leamas is one possible answer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why he matters:<\/strong> He helped destroy the assumption that fictional intelligence work had to be glamorous.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 4. Bernard Samson<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Created by Len Deighton<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Bernard Samson is one of espionage fiction's great working intelligence officers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He knows Berlin. He knows the people. He understands field operations. He also understands that intelligence services are bureaucracies filled with ambition, incompetence, rivalry, class distinctions, and office politics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Beginning with Berlin Game<\/em>, Deighton's Samson novels use intelligence operations to tell a much larger story about loyalty and betrayal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Samson is particularly effective because his professional and personal worlds collide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In espionage fiction, betrayal is always more powerful when it has a face.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why he matters:<\/strong> Samson made the career intelligence officer's professional and domestic lives inseparable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 5. Harry Palmer<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Created by Len Deighton | Named in the film adaptations<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Deighton's protagonist in The IPCRESS File<\/em> is unnamed in the novels, but the film version, played by Michael Caine, gave the character the name by which he became famous: Harry Palmer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Palmer was another direct challenge to Bond.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He wore glasses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He worried about money.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He dealt with bureaucracy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He cooked.<\/p>\n\n\n\n His superiors could be irritating, his assignments confusing, and his own organization nearly as troublesome as the opposition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Yet he was competent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n That combination mattered. Palmer demonstrated that an intelligence professional could be ordinary without being dull.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why he matters:<\/strong> He helped establish the anti-glamorous intelligence officer as a viable popular hero.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 6. Paul Christopher<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Created by Charles McCarry<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Paul Christopher deserves to be much better known among contemporary spy-fiction readers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A CIA intelligence officer and the central figure in several Charles McCarry novels, Christopher is intelligent, cultured, observant, and psychologically complex.<\/p>\n\n\n\n McCarry had worked for the CIA, and that experience gives the Christopher novels a distinctive quality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Intelligence is not merely something the characters do.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It is a way they perceive the world.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In The Tears of Autumn<\/em>, Christopher constructs a controversial theory about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy by connecting events others regard as unrelated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n That is intelligence work transformed into narrative.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why he matters:<\/strong> Christopher is one of American espionage fiction's finest portraits of the thinking intelligence professional.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 7. Jason Bourne<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Created by Robert Ludlum<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Jason Bourne occupies a complicated place on a list of intelligence officers because identity itself is the foundation of his story.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A man is pulled from the Mediterranean with no memory of who he is.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The evidence suggests that he is a professional killer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n But is he?<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Bourne Identity<\/em> turned intelligence identity into a mystery. Training remains even when memory disappears. Bourne's instincts tell him things his conscious mind cannot explain.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ludlum also accelerated the genre. Intelligence agencies, conspiracies, covert programs, assassins, and international pursuit became components of an increasingly fast-moving thriller.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why he matters:<\/strong> Bourne helped establish the modern intelligence-action protagonist while turning the operative's own identity into the central secret.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 8. Gabriel Allon<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Created by Daniel Silva<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Gabriel Allon has one of the more unusual r\u00e9sum\u00e9s in espionage fiction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He is an art restorer and an Israeli intelligence operative.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The combination works remarkably well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Restoration requires patience, precision, attention to detail, and an ability to understand what lies beneath a visible surface.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So does intelligence work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Across Daniel Silva's long-running series, Allon evolves from operative to increasingly senior intelligence figure while the novels explore terrorism, political violence, historical memory, and Israeli security.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Few modern spy-fiction characters have sustained such a long and successful fictional career.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why he matters:<\/strong> Allon became one of the defining intelligence protagonists of contemporary espionage fiction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 9. Jack Ryan<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Created by Tom Clancy<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Jack Ryan begins as an analyst.<\/p>\n\n\n\n That is important.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Popular spy fiction often privileges the person in the field, but intelligence organizations depend heavily upon people who interpret information.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ryan's ability is analytical. He recognizes connections, evaluates intentions, and understands strategic problems.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Of course, being a Tom Clancy character means he does not remain behind a desk forever.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Across the series, Ryan's career expands dramatically, eventually carrying him far beyond the conventional boundaries of intelligence work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n But his analytical origins remain essential to the character.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why he matters:<\/strong> Ryan helped make the intelligence analyst a mainstream thriller protagonist.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 10. Jackal<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Created by Frederick Forsyth<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n The Jackal is not an intelligence officer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He belongs here anyway.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Espionage fiction is defined partly by the adversaries intelligence and security officers must understand, and Frederick Forsyth's anonymous professional assassin in The Day of the Jackal<\/em> is one of the genre's most influential.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He plans meticulously.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He constructs identities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He understands security procedures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He anticipates investigative responses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n His professionalism forces those hunting him to become equally professional.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The result is a contest built around preparation, identity, detection, and countermeasures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why he matters:<\/strong> The Jackal helped establish the hyper-competent covert adversary as one of intelligence fiction's enduring character types.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 11. Magnus Pym<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Created by John le Carr\u00e9<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Magnus Pym is an intelligence officer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He is also a traitor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n That makes him one of the most psychologically important characters on this list.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A Perfect Spy<\/em> asks how someone becomes capable of living multiple lives long before an intelligence service formally teaches him to do so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Pym adapts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He charms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He lies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He compartmentalizes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He becomes whatever circumstances require.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The qualities that make him valuable to intelligence also make betrayal possible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why he matters:<\/strong> Pym transforms the spy from an occupation into a psychological condition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 12. Dominika Egorova<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Created by Jason Matthews<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Dominika Egorova enters the intelligence world through Russian service and becomes the center of Jason Matthews' Red Sparrow<\/em> trilogy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Matthews was a former CIA officer, and his novels brought unusually detailed attention to surveillance, countersurveillance, recruitment, asset handling, clandestine meetings, and operational security.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Dominika is particularly interesting because intelligence organizations are not merely employers in her story.<\/p>\n\n\n\n They attempt to control identity, loyalty, relationships, and survival.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Her choices become increasingly complicated as personal and institutional loyalties collide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why she matters:<\/strong> Dominika became one of the most prominent female intelligence protagonists of twenty-first-century spy fiction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 13. Carrie Mathison<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n From Homeland<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Television deserves a place in this discussion because some of the most influential modern intelligence characters were created for the screen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Carrie Mathison is a CIA officer whose greatest strength is pattern recognition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n She sees connections others dismiss.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Sometimes she is right.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Sometimes her certainty creates its own problems.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Homeland<\/em> places intelligence analysis, source handling, counterterrorism, bureaucratic conflict, surveillance, and political pressure at the center of the drama.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Carrie is neither Bond nor Smiley.<\/p>\n\n\n\n She is something distinctly modern: an intelligence professional operating inside a system drowning in information while trying to determine which fragments actually matter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why she matters:<\/strong> Carrie Mathison helped bring intelligence analysis and counterterrorism into mainstream serialized television drama.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 14. Nicholas Elliott<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Actually, no.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is where a list like this needs discipline.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Nicholas Elliott was real.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Espionage fiction frequently borrows so heavily from actual intelligence history that fictional and historical personalities begin to occupy the same mental bookshelf.<\/p>\n\n\n\n That confusion is worth remembering.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The best spy fiction often feels real precisely because its characters resemble people who might actually have inhabited the secret world.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So instead, let us turn to someone unmistakably fictional.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 14. Jackson Lamb<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Created by Mick Herron<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Jackson Lamb is offensive, disheveled, manipulative, frequently disgusting, and extremely good at his job.<\/p>\n\n\n\n That combination should not work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It does.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Lamb runs Slough House, the administrative dumping ground for MI5 personnel whose careers have collapsed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He appears to be another failure among failures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Appearances are dangerous in espionage fiction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Lamb understands Whitehall, MI5, field operations, bureaucratic warfare, institutional secrets, and the weaknesses of the people around him.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Most importantly, he is fiercely protective of his unwanted officers, although he would probably consider that description insulting.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why he matters:<\/strong> Lamb reinvented the veteran British intelligence officer for an age suspicious of institutions and heroes alike.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 15. River Cartwright<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Created by Mick Herron<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n If Jackson Lamb represents what decades in intelligence can produce, River Cartwright represents the officer who still believes his career can be saved.<\/p>\n\n\n\n River wants to be in the field.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He wants meaningful assignments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He wants to prove himself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Instead, he finds himself among the \u201cslow horses.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n That frustration makes him useful as a point-of-view character because he retains expectations about intelligence work that the series repeatedly dismantles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why he matters:<\/strong> River provides the ambitious young officer's view of an institution considerably less glamorous than he imagined.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 16. John Wells<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Created by Alex Berenson<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n John Wells has spent years undercover inside al-Qaeda.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Deep cover creates a problem espionage fiction repeatedly returns to:<\/p>\n\n\n\n How long can someone inhabit another identity before that identity changes him?<\/p>\n\n\n\n When Wells returns to the American intelligence world, the question is not simply whether his intelligence is valuable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n It is whether he can still be trusted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n And perhaps whether he knows where his own loyalties now reside.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why he matters:<\/strong> Wells became an important fictional intelligence protagonist of the post-9\/11 era.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 17. Quiller<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Created by Adam Hall<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Quiller is a professional.<\/p>\n\n\n\n That word matters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He relies on observation, psychology, surveillance awareness, resistance to interrogation, and disciplined tradecraft.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The novels emphasize the mental contest between intelligence professionals rather than relying solely on weapons or gadgets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Quiller understands that the opposition is watching him and attempts to understand what they want him to believe.<\/p>\n\n\n\n That produces a particularly pure form of espionage fiction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why he matters:<\/strong> Quiller represents the intelligence officer as a specialist in human behavior and operational tradecraft.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 18. Alex Leamas<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n We have already met Alec Leamas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n And that accidental temptation to bring him back illustrates another problem with ranking intelligence characters: the great ones tend to dominate the conversation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So let us go somewhere different.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 18. Evelyn Salt<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n From Salt<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Evelyn Salt begins as a CIA officer accused of being a Russian sleeper agent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n From that moment, identity and allegiance become unstable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The character belongs to the more action-oriented branch of intelligence fiction, but the central premise is classic counterintelligence:<\/p>\n\n\n\n What happens when an intelligence service can no longer be certain that one of its own officers is who she claims to be?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why she matters:<\/strong> Salt brought the sleeper-agent and mole traditions into a modern female-led intelligence action thriller.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 19. Harry Pearce<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n From Spooks<\/em> | MI-5<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Harry Pearce represents intelligence leadership rather than the lone operative.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As head of MI5's Section D, Harry must balance operations, politics, personnel, national security, and the consequences of decisions made under enormous pressure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n That makes him important.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Intelligence fiction sometimes treats senior officials merely as people who issue assignments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Harry is more interesting because command itself becomes part of the story.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why he matters:<\/strong> He demonstrates that directing intelligence operations can be as dramatically compelling as conducting them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 20. David Callan<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Created by James Mitchell<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Callan emerged from British television in the 1960s and belongs firmly to the anti-Bond tradition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He works for a secretive government organization and is exceptionally capable at violent work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He also dislikes much of what he is required to do.<\/p>\n\n\n\n That tension matters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The professional intelligence operative who questions the institution employing him would become one of the genre's most persistent character types.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why he matters:<\/strong> Callan helped establish the reluctant, morally conflicted intelligence operative on television.<\/p>\n\n\n\n What Makes a Great Fictional Intelligence Officer?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Looking across these characters, physical courage is almost incidental.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The memorable ones possess something else.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Smiley observes.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Bond acts.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Leamas endures.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Samson understands people.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Ryan analyzes.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Bourne improvises.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Allon balances creation and destruction.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Pym deceives.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Dominika survives.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Lamb understands institutions better than the institutions understand themselves.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Different characters represent different parts of intelligence work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n That is exactly as it should be.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Intelligence is not one profession. It is an interconnected collection of disciplines involving collection, analysis, counterintelligence, covert action, technology, languages, surveillance, recruitment, security, diplomacy, and human judgment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The fictional intelligence officer has gradually expanded to reflect that complexity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Three Who Changed Everything<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n If forced to reduce the entire list to three characters whose influence extends beyond their own stories, my choices would be:<\/p>\n\n\n\n James Bond. George Smiley. Jason Bourne.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Bond created the modern popular spy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Smiley dismantled him.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Bourne rebuilt the intelligence hero for a faster, more suspicious age.<\/p>\n\n\n\n You could make an excellent argument for replacing Bourne with Bernard Samson, Jack Ryan, Gabriel Allon, or Jackson Lamb.<\/p>\n\n\n\n I would listen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n That's half the pleasure of lists like this.<\/p>\n\n\n\n And Who Did We Miss?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n There are many.<\/p>\n\n\n\n That is not a defect in espionage fiction. It is evidence of its extraordinary depth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The genre has been producing memorable intelligence officers for more than a century, and every generation seems determined to reinvent them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Some are patriots.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Some are cynics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Some are bureaucrats.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Some are killers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Some betray their services.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Some are betrayed by them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The best eventually reveal the same truth:<\/p>\n\n\n\n An intelligence officer becomes interesting not because he possesses secrets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He becomes interesting because of what those secrets require him to do.<\/p>\n\n\n\n And because, sooner or later, he must decide where his loyalty really lies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Alexander Hale<\/strong> Continue Your Discovery.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Ask readers to name the greatest fictional spies and the conversation quickly becomes an argument. James Bond? George Smiley? Jason Bourne? Carrie Mathison? Jackson Lamb? The problem is partly the question. \u201cSpy\u201d is an extraordinarily broad description. Espionage fiction has given us case officers, intelligence analysts, assassins, counterintelligence investigators, undercover operatives, asset handlers, defectors, double […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":21,"featured_media":2696,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"wds_primary_category":1,"footnotes":""},"categories":[162],"tags":[],"post_folder":[],"class_list":["post-2726","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-fiction-desk"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spyscribe.com\/isdb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2726","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spyscribe.com\/isdb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spyscribe.com\/isdb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spyscribe.com\/isdb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/21"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spyscribe.com\/isdb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2726"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spyscribe.com\/isdb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2726\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spyscribe.com\/isdb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2696"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spyscribe.com\/isdb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2726"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spyscribe.com\/isdb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2726"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spyscribe.com\/isdb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2726"},{"taxonomy":"post_folder","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spyscribe.com\/isdb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/post_folder?post=2726"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
Intelligence Editor, ISDb | The Intelligence & Spy Database<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n